sk2009
03-07 10:21 PM
Hi
my kids received finger print notice in 1st week of feb 2008 where as my self and my husband got it in Oct 2007
and we were told by my attorney FP is not required for kids below 14 0r so
we didnot try to call USCIS
my kids received finger print notice in 1st week of feb 2008 where as my self and my husband got it in Oct 2007
and we were told by my attorney FP is not required for kids below 14 0r so
we didnot try to call USCIS
wallpaper It contains icons from our
RenaissanceGirl
10-02 12:51 PM
New wacom?! Oooh, what did you get?
go2roomshare
03-29 04:57 PM
What I don't understand is why you are filing another I-140 when you already filed I-485? In any case you can use AC21 only after your 485 has been pending for more than 180 days.
For PD porting you need to file I 140
For PD porting you need to file I 140
2011 Blogger Tricks | 3/03/2011
Anders �stberg
February 11th, 2004, 06:46 AM
The ceiling of this walkway is hard to look at, it keeps flipping over into a cone
that points towards me... what do you think?
http://www.interimlocation.com/fretnomore/photo/10d/pictures/misc/walkwaytunnel_2339.jpg
that points towards me... what do you think?
http://www.interimlocation.com/fretnomore/photo/10d/pictures/misc/walkwaytunnel_2339.jpg
more...
anilsal
07-06 10:43 PM
Dear Core Team,
Can you please indicate on the site if there are any bills (pending or otherwise in both the house and senate) that can get renewed focus or revived that would offer some sort of relief to the current situation of unavailability of visa numbers in the employment based green card process. I strongly feel that the current momentum and attention being drawn by the DOS/CIS update can be used to urge congress to pass some interim measure outside of CIR. That is where in my opinion should IV's focus be at this juncture. If and when you post anything on the site, i and other IV members i'm sure shall begin calling house reps. and senators to urge them for bringing the bill to the floor so that it provides relief to hundreds of thousands of legal immigrants.
Thanks!
Please IM the core members directly. I am not one. But I am sure once they ascertain your identity, they will provide all the details that you require.
Can you please indicate on the site if there are any bills (pending or otherwise in both the house and senate) that can get renewed focus or revived that would offer some sort of relief to the current situation of unavailability of visa numbers in the employment based green card process. I strongly feel that the current momentum and attention being drawn by the DOS/CIS update can be used to urge congress to pass some interim measure outside of CIR. That is where in my opinion should IV's focus be at this juncture. If and when you post anything on the site, i and other IV members i'm sure shall begin calling house reps. and senators to urge them for bringing the bill to the floor so that it provides relief to hundreds of thousands of legal immigrants.
Thanks!
Please IM the core members directly. I am not one. But I am sure once they ascertain your identity, they will provide all the details that you require.
qplearn
08-23 06:39 PM
Thanks Dixie. I think I will talk to my lawyer.
I guess I will have to apply for I-140 again, right?
qplearn
Since EB-1 does not need labor certification, the process is completely independent of EB-2. As such you cannot "port" your EB-2 application the way people transition from EB-3 to EB-2. You will have to apply directly to USCIS with evidence of your "extraordinary ability" in your field, such as honorable membership of professional bodies, research track record, letters from well-known people in your field etc. The first stepto convince USCIS about exceptional ability is very involved, but there on I-140 and I-485 should proceed far more smoothly than EB-2.
I guess I will have to apply for I-140 again, right?
qplearn
Since EB-1 does not need labor certification, the process is completely independent of EB-2. As such you cannot "port" your EB-2 application the way people transition from EB-3 to EB-2. You will have to apply directly to USCIS with evidence of your "extraordinary ability" in your field, such as honorable membership of professional bodies, research track record, letters from well-known people in your field etc. The first stepto convince USCIS about exceptional ability is very involved, but there on I-140 and I-485 should proceed far more smoothly than EB-2.
more...
admin
03-10 08:50 PM
True enough, Dixie. I was hoping that other affected parties would become aware of this site through digg. Even one more contribution through this promotion would be worth it, I think.
Whatever it takes. That's the spirit saiku. We need more and more people who will execute their ideas.
Whatever it takes. That's the spirit saiku. We need more and more people who will execute their ideas.
2010 Clicking the icon shows a
gcformeornot
12-04 07:25 AM
Indeed the consulate websites are confusing. Anyway I found the NOC form.
My daughter had 5 year passport which is expiring soon. So you have to apply for new passport.
Thanks again.
My daughter had 5 year passport which is expiring soon. So you have to apply for new passport.
Thanks again.
more...
kirupa
04-22 04:55 PM
I really like your last two entries! :beam:
hair images flickr logo icon.
ricky26
03-22 10:59 PM
as long as your gc is pending, you can get 1 year extension. After 140 approval and 485 still pending you can get 3 year extension. OR you can apply for EAD to continue in status.
more...
tonyHK12
05-19 01:05 PM
Don't you know this baby will stop Skynet in 2035 and save mankind ?
Especially along the border, helping to create a large numer of manual, non-robotic, labor jobs that will help to pass CIR.
Especially along the border, helping to create a large numer of manual, non-robotic, labor jobs that will help to pass CIR.
hot SEO friendly logger title
srthegr8
08-07 12:30 PM
Hi ,
I want to change my wife's H1 to H4.
She got her first approval in oct 2006 and was working as fulltime. after that she coverted to H4 when we visited india. her H4 is valid through oct'09. then we file for her new H1 from company B in march 09 (COS) and she got approval but due to bad market condition she never got project and her consulting company never paid her so she doesn't have any paystubs. My company file for my H1B extension and I got approval.
Now I want to change my wife's status back to h4. I had in impression that she never worked on new H1 so her H1 will not be activated. but I came across some posts and learn that it is automatically activated the day she got her H1B approval.
Now please suggest me what would be the safest way to convert her back on H4 ?
1)File form I-539 without her paystubs using my new 797 document? is there chances of RFE without paystubs? and what could be the next step if RFE comes? can we go to home country and get it done or it will make more complications? and VO will ask more questions because of RFE?
2) go out of county and come back again on existing stammped h4 (I am hoping that will convert her status back to H4)? and then file for I-539 for H4 extension using my new Approval notice? she has canadian PR as well. should she visit canada or india? somehow her I94 on passport has expired in Feb'09 but she has valid I94 on her H1 pitition. should she give her new I94 when going out of country? if she visits canada will they issue her new I94 if she returns back within 30 days?
3) should she go outside country and apply for new H4 using my new approved 797 ?
Please help me ASAP. I am really confused what should I do!!!
I want to change my wife's H1 to H4.
She got her first approval in oct 2006 and was working as fulltime. after that she coverted to H4 when we visited india. her H4 is valid through oct'09. then we file for her new H1 from company B in march 09 (COS) and she got approval but due to bad market condition she never got project and her consulting company never paid her so she doesn't have any paystubs. My company file for my H1B extension and I got approval.
Now I want to change my wife's status back to h4. I had in impression that she never worked on new H1 so her H1 will not be activated. but I came across some posts and learn that it is automatically activated the day she got her H1B approval.
Now please suggest me what would be the safest way to convert her back on H4 ?
1)File form I-539 without her paystubs using my new 797 document? is there chances of RFE without paystubs? and what could be the next step if RFE comes? can we go to home country and get it done or it will make more complications? and VO will ask more questions because of RFE?
2) go out of county and come back again on existing stammped h4 (I am hoping that will convert her status back to H4)? and then file for I-539 for H4 extension using my new Approval notice? she has canadian PR as well. should she visit canada or india? somehow her I94 on passport has expired in Feb'09 but she has valid I94 on her H1 pitition. should she give her new I94 when going out of country? if she visits canada will they issue her new I94 if she returns back within 30 days?
3) should she go outside country and apply for new H4 using my new approved 797 ?
Please help me ASAP. I am really confused what should I do!!!
more...
house Blogger has decided to stop
moonrah
05-11 06:23 PM
I think you are talking about labor certification, but how about I-140
tattoo added to Blogger#39;s labs is
subba
11-02 09:14 AM
I believe you pay 10% penalty if you withdraw before retirement age, irrespective of whether you reside in the US at time of withdrawal.
However, note that it *might* be possible to save on taxes because you might have very little other US income in the year you withdraw. One dependency here is what tax laws and treaties your home country has on foreign income.
However, note that it *might* be possible to save on taxes because you might have very little other US income in the year you withdraw. One dependency here is what tax laws and treaties your home country has on foreign income.
more...
pictures SEM Labs Web Blog Icon Pack
skagitswimmer
April 18th, 2005, 10:49 PM
I shot this with my old dig camera - a Sony F707
The colour is pretty much unaltered. I cleaned up a few stray reflections in the water and tried to lighten the eyes of the loons a bit. I would be intested in any criticism at all.
The colour is pretty much unaltered. I cleaned up a few stray reflections in the water and tried to lighten the eyes of the loons a bit. I would be intested in any criticism at all.
dresses It is my 1st icon set to ever
Foster2007
07-09 08:11 PM
I think this is great!!!
more...
makeup Google#39;s Blogger in Draft
upuaut8
05-23 12:41 AM
have you clicked on the "animate" toggle button on the right hand side of the toolbar? If not you can't set any animations.
girlfriend SEO friendly logger title
eb3_nepa
12-11 10:23 AM
A thought about meeting the Senators/Congressmen.
Should we not meet the new senators and congressmen now, BEFORE they actually join office? I have a feeling that once they take office, they will become too busy with day to day stuff and immigration will DEFINITELY become a back-burner issue.
Is it possible to meet the new people moving in after January, now instead of after they take office?
Should we not meet the new senators and congressmen now, BEFORE they actually join office? I have a feeling that once they take office, they will become too busy with day to day stuff and immigration will DEFINITELY become a back-burner issue.
Is it possible to meet the new people moving in after January, now instead of after they take office?
hairstyles Google/Blogger#39;s spam
Ann Ruben
04-28 11:04 AM
Assuming you meet the requirements for E visa status as an employee and not an owner of the company, this is a viable strategy.
MDix
09-28 09:14 PM
Twenty Legislative Priorities for Lame-Duck Session, including DREAM. This is our chance to PUSH RE-CAPTURE.
Democrats to stuff 20 bills into post-election lame-duck session - TheHill.com (http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/121223-dems-stuff-lame-duck)
Democrats to stuff 20 bills into post-election lame-duck session - TheHill.com (http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/121223-dems-stuff-lame-duck)
die_exquisita
07-07 04:42 AM
Hello,
Thanks for the reply!
So the letter is just an employment continuation or verification letter and has nothing that states the spousal details or spouse's intention to accompany the H1 holder. I hope I got that right.
Thanks again!
Thanks for the reply!
So the letter is just an employment continuation or verification letter and has nothing that states the spousal details or spouse's intention to accompany the H1 holder. I hope I got that right.
Thanks again!
No comments:
Post a Comment