tnite
09-11 12:08 PM
Before i begin let me say its my mistake :(
My EAD expires Oct 08 and my lawyer sent me the forms to file in and send it back to him to be filed in Aug 08. But it was delayed by me till last week and was filed yesterday. what are my chances of getting EAD and continue working. In June 08 i went to India and came back using AP so i am not in H1 (i assume).
what should i do if i dont get EAD approved before oct 08?
Thanks:confused:
stop working until you get your EAD
My EAD expires Oct 08 and my lawyer sent me the forms to file in and send it back to him to be filed in Aug 08. But it was delayed by me till last week and was filed yesterday. what are my chances of getting EAD and continue working. In June 08 i went to India and came back using AP so i am not in H1 (i assume).
what should i do if i dont get EAD approved before oct 08?
Thanks:confused:
stop working until you get your EAD
wallpaper ethenny frankel forbes
lonedesi
05-19 10:14 AM
Should the job title for PERM labor filing be in Job Zone 5 to qualify under EB2 category? Or could one apply in Job Zone 4 and still qualify for a EB2? Also, does having an MBA, exempt a person from EB quota under any of the proposed bills like STEM, SKIL, PACE, TALENT or should it have to be an MS in Engineering.
A quick response would be greatly appreciated.
A quick response would be greatly appreciated.
Kaianna
08-09 02:39 PM
My lawyer checked my application type as
"h", and stating "Spouse has an approved I-140"
Since I am filing as dependent. Should it be "b" " my spouse or parent applied for adjustment..."
Does it hurt to choose "h"? Thanks!!
"h", and stating "Spouse has an approved I-140"
Since I am filing as dependent. Should it be "b" " my spouse or parent applied for adjustment..."
Does it hurt to choose "h"? Thanks!!
2011 Bethenny Frankel Forbes Images
bugsbunny
08-05 02:47 PM
You can move you H1B visa from Company A to Company B. Talk to your attorney. Because you already have an approved H1 you will not be subject to H1 cap while applying for H1 through Company B.
I do not think Company A can apply for a H1 extension based on I140 and I485 of comapny B. But ask your attorney as to what your options are
I do not think Company A can apply for a H1 extension based on I140 and I485 of comapny B. But ask your attorney as to what your options are
more...
letstalklc
08-13 11:09 AM
You are eligible for 3 years extension with the approved I140. I also applied my H1 extension by attaching approved 140 for 3 years extension, I got it last month...
it will not like 2 yrs and then 3 yrs.....go for 3 years...I think lawyer should know all these....
Good luck...
it will not like 2 yrs and then 3 yrs.....go for 3 years...I think lawyer should know all these....
Good luck...
greencard_fever
06-26 08:19 AM
some body please reply...
more...
vikramy
02-15 10:22 AM
Will see how it works out for me
2010 ethenny frankel forbes
Horace Jones
07-15 09:12 AM
I agree that option B is the correct choice. They are looking for you to have a stable residency, so having it established as the application time nears makes the most sense. Still, I would consult with an expert or an attorney if you have the opportunity.
more...
dan19
01-11 04:13 PM
Try for next year. Apply in April itself!
Guys:
Does anyone know what is the current count on H1-B Visas left for the year 2006-07 ?
I know I may sound stupid and probably the answer is that it is already complete, but wanted to confirm.
Also, when would the next years quota become available and when can one start working at the earliest ?
Is there any other way to file for H1-B now and work..?
Thanks
Guys:
Does anyone know what is the current count on H1-B Visas left for the year 2006-07 ?
I know I may sound stupid and probably the answer is that it is already complete, but wanted to confirm.
Also, when would the next years quota become available and when can one start working at the earliest ?
Is there any other way to file for H1-B now and work..?
Thanks
hair cover of Forbes magazine!
bkarnik
03-08 02:13 PM
This is my opinion only (not IV's).
My feeling is that the Iraq Accountability Act and other similar bills that will be flooding the Congress with the Democrats in majority should have a minimal impact if any on the CIR. First, the CIR whenever it is introduced will be referred to the Judiciary committees of the Senate and House for markup. After the Judiciary committee is done, then the modified version will come before the entire Senate and House for additional discussion, debate, amendments, etc. before going to a vote. Assuming the bills are passed by the Senate and House, they will have a conference to sort out the differences in the House and Senate bills and then this final version of the bill will be placed before the House and Senate for a final vote. Once, this vote takes place and the bill is passed, then it goes to the President for signature.
In a nutshell, the CIR will alongwith other bills be processed in a parallel manner. A lot is in the hands of the Senate Majority Leader (sen. Reid) and House Speaker (Rep. Pelosi) in when and how long they want to schedule a debate on any bill that has passed through committee and is ready for floor action.
My feeling is that the Iraq Accountability Act and other similar bills that will be flooding the Congress with the Democrats in majority should have a minimal impact if any on the CIR. First, the CIR whenever it is introduced will be referred to the Judiciary committees of the Senate and House for markup. After the Judiciary committee is done, then the modified version will come before the entire Senate and House for additional discussion, debate, amendments, etc. before going to a vote. Assuming the bills are passed by the Senate and House, they will have a conference to sort out the differences in the House and Senate bills and then this final version of the bill will be placed before the House and Senate for a final vote. Once, this vote takes place and the bill is passed, then it goes to the President for signature.
In a nutshell, the CIR will alongwith other bills be processed in a parallel manner. A lot is in the hands of the Senate Majority Leader (sen. Reid) and House Speaker (Rep. Pelosi) in when and how long they want to schedule a debate on any bill that has passed through committee and is ready for floor action.
more...
sgorla
06-21 03:19 PM
My attorney sent me G-325A to fill up. It has 4 similar pages, where you need to enter your information. Now, my question is do I need to fill out all four pages with my information, and then fill out another 4 pages with my wife's info?
Please advise me if anyone has filled out thi s form.
Thanks!
Please advise me if anyone has filled out thi s form.
Thanks!
hot ethenny frankel forbes
kirupa
07-25 01:35 AM
Added!
more...
house images ethenny frankel forbes
sammywammy
04-27 10:24 PM
The lawyers did some mixup/goofup and I lost my June 2002 PD. Here is the sequence of events.
Original Labor (Labor1)
PD: June 2002
Category: EB3 (incorrectly filed at that time by lawyers)
State: CA
We didn’t hear about the whereabouts of my labor1 case because it was sent to the Backlog Processing center (all cases after May 2002 were sent)
So the lawyers suggested filing a new labor under PERM.
Second Labor (Labor2)
PD: Oct 2005
Category: EB2
Approved: in December 2005
Second I140
Approved: in December 2005/Early 2006
Received Original Labor Approval in end of Dec 2006
The lawyers decided to combine the 2 cases and file for I-485.
i.e. use the ORIGINAL Labor PD and SECOND Labor EB2.
In April 2007, 485 application was open for “EB2” – “June 2002”.
So the lawyers filed for concurrent I-485 and I-140 for the ORIGINAL EB3 case (they submitted Second Approved EB2 I-140 along with it)
ORIGINAL I-140 was approved in Oct 2007
PLEASE NOTE: the unique situation is that the SECOND I140 was approved before the ORIGINAL I140.
Since April, 2007 - We were told by my company lawyers that the 485 is under process EB2 PD June 2002.
The GC Visa number have been available for EB2 PD June 2002 for a long time now.
But we still hadn’t received our Greencard for a long time and were wondering what is causing this delay.
So after much ado by our lawyers, they agreed to check with USCIS.
Because the Second I140 was approved before the First I1-40, USCIS said that we cannot use old PD
According to our lawyers, Now our current case status is “supposedly” OCT 2005 EB2. So we lost the June 2002 PD.
Is there anyway to recapture the old PD? (with or without refilling I-485)
Any suggestions,help or insight will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks and Regards
Sam
Original Labor (Labor1)
PD: June 2002
Category: EB3 (incorrectly filed at that time by lawyers)
State: CA
We didn’t hear about the whereabouts of my labor1 case because it was sent to the Backlog Processing center (all cases after May 2002 were sent)
So the lawyers suggested filing a new labor under PERM.
Second Labor (Labor2)
PD: Oct 2005
Category: EB2
Approved: in December 2005
Second I140
Approved: in December 2005/Early 2006
Received Original Labor Approval in end of Dec 2006
The lawyers decided to combine the 2 cases and file for I-485.
i.e. use the ORIGINAL Labor PD and SECOND Labor EB2.
In April 2007, 485 application was open for “EB2” – “June 2002”.
So the lawyers filed for concurrent I-485 and I-140 for the ORIGINAL EB3 case (they submitted Second Approved EB2 I-140 along with it)
ORIGINAL I-140 was approved in Oct 2007
PLEASE NOTE: the unique situation is that the SECOND I140 was approved before the ORIGINAL I140.
Since April, 2007 - We were told by my company lawyers that the 485 is under process EB2 PD June 2002.
The GC Visa number have been available for EB2 PD June 2002 for a long time now.
But we still hadn’t received our Greencard for a long time and were wondering what is causing this delay.
So after much ado by our lawyers, they agreed to check with USCIS.
Because the Second I140 was approved before the First I1-40, USCIS said that we cannot use old PD
According to our lawyers, Now our current case status is “supposedly” OCT 2005 EB2. So we lost the June 2002 PD.
Is there anyway to recapture the old PD? (with or without refilling I-485)
Any suggestions,help or insight will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks and Regards
Sam
tattoo It#39;s 7 a.m. and Bethenny
Blog Feeds
06-13 05:40 PM
Last week I attended the Annual Immigration Lawyers conference in Las Vegas. During the conference, government officials spent some time to update the attendees of the most recent information and upcoming changes.
It seems that the collection of the $500 fraud fee for new H1B or L-1 petitions is being used to invest in hiring more investigators. One recent trend is that business practices that were standard and went unchallenged previously, now are being viewed as �fraud.� Many companies must revise their practices to meet current standards. This does not mean that these practices of employers or businesses are necessarily fraudulent.
The biggest frustration for lawyers dealing with H1B's are the unreasonable RFE's being issued by the service since the April 1 filing. USCIS is making requests for photos of the premises, copies of contracts between all involved parties, and evidence of doing business including leases, licenses, and other proof. These requests are onerous for employers, as well as disruptive and harmful to both the employer and the employee when the H1B petition is often denied without valid justification.
USCIS presumes fraud if the employer meets two out of the following three criteria: has been doing business for fewer than ten years, has fewer than 25 employees, and/or has less than $10 million in revenue. Most well-established, bona fide companies started with these drawbacks. Even many large, well-known, highly-reputable companies are being issued intensive requests for evidence (RFEs) that seem to be without basis. This trend must stop, otherwise employers will be discouraged from filing for new H1B workers.
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2009/06/h1b_visa_lawyer_cap_not_met_an.html)
It seems that the collection of the $500 fraud fee for new H1B or L-1 petitions is being used to invest in hiring more investigators. One recent trend is that business practices that were standard and went unchallenged previously, now are being viewed as �fraud.� Many companies must revise their practices to meet current standards. This does not mean that these practices of employers or businesses are necessarily fraudulent.
The biggest frustration for lawyers dealing with H1B's are the unreasonable RFE's being issued by the service since the April 1 filing. USCIS is making requests for photos of the premises, copies of contracts between all involved parties, and evidence of doing business including leases, licenses, and other proof. These requests are onerous for employers, as well as disruptive and harmful to both the employer and the employee when the H1B petition is often denied without valid justification.
USCIS presumes fraud if the employer meets two out of the following three criteria: has been doing business for fewer than ten years, has fewer than 25 employees, and/or has less than $10 million in revenue. Most well-established, bona fide companies started with these drawbacks. Even many large, well-known, highly-reputable companies are being issued intensive requests for evidence (RFEs) that seem to be without basis. This trend must stop, otherwise employers will be discouraged from filing for new H1B workers.
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2009/06/h1b_visa_lawyer_cap_not_met_an.html)
more...
pictures ethenny frankel to get new
Life2Live
09-07 01:06 PM
Use the following link to see USCIS Application and Receipting Update
http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=ace7ec20cfbd4110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCR D
http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=ace7ec20cfbd4110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCR D
dresses ethenny frankel forbes
spicy_guy
10-13 01:27 PM
With EAD, yes.
more...
makeup one on Bethenny Frankel)
hpandey
01-05 11:50 AM
There is just one other way that you apply for citizenship , get it and then sponser them for GC again but that whole process would take a year at least and money too.
Best thing would be to wait . I am sure that EB3 India would move by a couple of months in this year and your family would get the GC's. If you have waited for the last 8 years for them , another few months should not matter.
Going the citizenship route is probably going to take longer in your case I think . You can try that if EB3 doesn't move in the next six months.
Best thing would be to wait . I am sure that EB3 India would move by a couple of months in this year and your family would get the GC's. If you have waited for the last 8 years for them , another few months should not matter.
Going the citizenship route is probably going to take longer in your case I think . You can try that if EB3 doesn't move in the next six months.
girlfriend Bethenny Frankel makes Forbes
chakdepatte
11-08 04:12 PM
i have a trip scheduled via dubai to bombay and back. Intend to stay for 3-4 days on my way to bombay as well as 3-4 days returning back. How do i get transit visas for both of these short term visits.
Thanks
Chakdpatte
Thanks
Chakdpatte
hairstyles Bethenny Frankel#39;s cover.
prince40
03-15 10:20 PM
concurrent filing means filing of I-140 and I-485 together not two I-140s.
why do you want to put false data on your profile? such as EB1 at Perm stage with 2000 priority date?
Are you trying to mock all the IV members? Or just being silly?
by concurrent i meant can you file two i-140s under the same EB2 category [regular and NIW] at the same time??
P.S.-regarding my profile that's the default setting w.r.t priority date etc when i set up my account., trying to edit this
why do you want to put false data on your profile? such as EB1 at Perm stage with 2000 priority date?
Are you trying to mock all the IV members? Or just being silly?
by concurrent i meant can you file two i-140s under the same EB2 category [regular and NIW] at the same time??
P.S.-regarding my profile that's the default setting w.r.t priority date etc when i set up my account., trying to edit this
boston_gc
09-11 01:56 PM
Gurus:
Anyone has been in the similar situation. I really don;t want to start my PERM application if owning a company stock will trigger an audit.
If there is even a slight possibility, I would like to give back the stocks to the company (if it is possible)
Thanks,
Anyone has been in the similar situation. I really don;t want to start my PERM application if owning a company stock will trigger an audit.
If there is even a slight possibility, I would like to give back the stocks to the company (if it is possible)
Thanks,
andycool
06-04 04:07 PM
All this inventory etc dosent make sense ,
Pending EB2 cases for china are around 2000 as per USCIS inventory .
but as per DOS Demand data its only 500 ..
God Knows whats Happening .
Thanks
Pending EB2 cases for china are around 2000 as per USCIS inventory .
but as per DOS Demand data its only 500 ..
God Knows whats Happening .
Thanks
No comments:
Post a Comment