miguy
11-02 03:22 PM
My labour was filed for a software engineer position (java, udb, etc) 3 years ago. Over that time, my role has changed to a project manager. Infact I don't do any coding anymore. If I invoke AC21 after 180 days, can I switch to a Project Manager position?
thanks,
thanks,
wallpaper Annie#39;s Golden Retriever
harrydr
02-04 04:19 PM
Is it possible to speak to someone at the consulate in case you have been denied a visa before??
sonia_sd
09-21 05:29 PM
Can anybody throw some light on this.
2011 cute golden retriever puppy
GCmuddu_H1BVaddu
05-08 08:02 PM
Start with Libra. I have seen people talk, talk, talk and talk about immigraton and gone with the wind right next day they get the green card. Start with a member 'libra', he always used to blame eevrybody, not seen since the day he got his GC. Share some other names.
more...
ajmal744
02-21 12:18 PM
Hi ajmal!
It is not possible currently to get the full height of your entire image composition.
Cheers!
Kirupa
Thanks a lot for your reply.
I was wondering how the engine is calculating the scaling of the image to change the ViewPort, while zooming in and out. Does the change of ViewPort and the image composition within it depends only on the viewport width?
I have not able to find much greater details on this yet from MS. Would you be able to direct me please to some materials to understand more on Multiscale image control and its working in and out.
Cheers
Ajmal
It is not possible currently to get the full height of your entire image composition.
Cheers!
Kirupa
Thanks a lot for your reply.
I was wondering how the engine is calculating the scaling of the image to change the ViewPort, while zooming in and out. Does the change of ViewPort and the image composition within it depends only on the viewport width?
I have not able to find much greater details on this yet from MS. Would you be able to direct me please to some materials to understand more on Multiscale image control and its working in and out.
Cheers
Ajmal
Blog Feeds
05-21 11:00 PM
Acting Associate Director Donald Neufeld has issued revised guidance regarding the
I-90 Application to Replace Permanent Resident Card. The guidance is dated February 6, 2009.
Previously, if an I-90 applicant presented a national security concern or had a record of arrest or presented an �Egregious Public Safety� concern, then the USCIS adjudicator was instructed to immediately suspend adjudication of the 1-90 and refer the case to ICE.
The problem with that position, as pointed out in the Neufeld memo, is that an I-90 applicant who is a Lawful Permanent Resident LPR holds that status until he or she either abandons it themselves or has it revoked through rescission or removal proceedings. Therefore, until the LPR status is either abandoned or revoked, the applicant is entitled to evidence of his or her status.
Now, the Neufeld memo provides that all 1-90 applications will be adjudicated when all of the basic filing requirements and conditions have been met:
1. The applicant has established his or her identity; and
2. It has been established that the applicant is a lawful permanent resident.
Once those conditions have been met, the I-90 should be approved regardless of whether derogatory information comes up during the fingerprint and IBIS checks. If that happens, the I-90 should still be approved first and the derogatory information issue addressed second, presumable with a referral to ICE.
In the past, some applicants have been served with Requests for Evidence (RFE) asking for arrest records or court dispositions. Now any RFE that is issued must be limited to requesting supporting documentation related to establishing identity or status.
.
More... (http://www.philadelphiaimmigrationlawyerblog.com/2009/05/i90_appliication_to_replace_gr.html)
I-90 Application to Replace Permanent Resident Card. The guidance is dated February 6, 2009.
Previously, if an I-90 applicant presented a national security concern or had a record of arrest or presented an �Egregious Public Safety� concern, then the USCIS adjudicator was instructed to immediately suspend adjudication of the 1-90 and refer the case to ICE.
The problem with that position, as pointed out in the Neufeld memo, is that an I-90 applicant who is a Lawful Permanent Resident LPR holds that status until he or she either abandons it themselves or has it revoked through rescission or removal proceedings. Therefore, until the LPR status is either abandoned or revoked, the applicant is entitled to evidence of his or her status.
Now, the Neufeld memo provides that all 1-90 applications will be adjudicated when all of the basic filing requirements and conditions have been met:
1. The applicant has established his or her identity; and
2. It has been established that the applicant is a lawful permanent resident.
Once those conditions have been met, the I-90 should be approved regardless of whether derogatory information comes up during the fingerprint and IBIS checks. If that happens, the I-90 should still be approved first and the derogatory information issue addressed second, presumable with a referral to ICE.
In the past, some applicants have been served with Requests for Evidence (RFE) asking for arrest records or court dispositions. Now any RFE that is issued must be limited to requesting supporting documentation related to establishing identity or status.
.
More... (http://www.philadelphiaimmigrationlawyerblog.com/2009/05/i90_appliication_to_replace_gr.html)
more...
simbasimba
01-06 02:21 AM
I have a 4 year college degree from the US and 5 years of experience. I would like to know when they say 5 years of progressive experience does also that include an increase in salary over the five years? My previous employer paid me 60kper anum but my new employer is paying me 55k per anum. There is drop in salary by 5 thousand. Will this affect my application. Please advise. Thanks much!
2010 Golden Retriever Puppies
voicerj
03-24 09:10 PM
Recently my employer has decreased the hourly rate given for many years in the pay stub but providing the difference as bonus. Will it affect my EB2 Classification and I-485 approval.
How Much is the difference and what status are you on ? EAD or still on H1B
How Much is the difference and what status are you on ? EAD or still on H1B
more...
go_guy123
07-19 01:15 PM
Hi,
My U.S. born son is travelling with my friends from India to USA. He had gone to India for summer vacation. Would anybody have any sample letter for addressing to immigration authorities that we authorize his travel along with my friend.
Thanks.
US born child is citizen by birth and has RIGHT to enter United States. Immigration officials cant deny him the right to enter USA.
A simple letter saying that you have authorised your friend to accompany your child (minor) for the travel. The letter should have your contact address, cell etc
My U.S. born son is travelling with my friends from India to USA. He had gone to India for summer vacation. Would anybody have any sample letter for addressing to immigration authorities that we authorize his travel along with my friend.
Thanks.
US born child is citizen by birth and has RIGHT to enter United States. Immigration officials cant deny him the right to enter USA.
A simple letter saying that you have authorised your friend to accompany your child (minor) for the travel. The letter should have your contact address, cell etc
hair Wonderful Golden Retriever
pappu
07-02 11:54 AM
Thank you Lazycis. I had posted a thread a couple of days ago when the report came out.
We are looking at our members doing some analyis work on this report and sending us their feedback. If you and others are interested, pls do so.
This will help IV efforts in help USCIS in fixing their problems and suggesting solutions to USCIS.
We are looking at our members doing some analyis work on this report and sending us their feedback. If you and others are interested, pls do so.
This will help IV efforts in help USCIS in fixing their problems and suggesting solutions to USCIS.
more...
sledge_hammer
07-01 01:48 PM
^^^^
hot Wet golden retriever puppy
hpandey
12-28 10:30 AM
Hi,
My wife has FP appointment scheduled for 12/29/07, She is in india now. I have returned from india today only(12/28) and saw the FP appointment. Can i reschedule FP one day before the appointment date? If i send the reschedule request today will USCIS accept it? since there is only one day left. Please advice me.
Thanks,
Sunil.
Hi Sunil
On 11/27 last month you said that you had received your FP appointment notice and you want to reschedule it . Did you not do it at that time ? Is this the second time you want to reschedule.
The procedure is the same as explained in your first post and yes you can reschedule it one day before it is due ( but I would strongly advise against it if this is the second time you want to reschedule ).
But I guess since your wife is in India you have no choice. Consult your lawyer also in this case so as to keep him in the loop and get his advise also.
My wife has FP appointment scheduled for 12/29/07, She is in india now. I have returned from india today only(12/28) and saw the FP appointment. Can i reschedule FP one day before the appointment date? If i send the reschedule request today will USCIS accept it? since there is only one day left. Please advice me.
Thanks,
Sunil.
Hi Sunil
On 11/27 last month you said that you had received your FP appointment notice and you want to reschedule it . Did you not do it at that time ? Is this the second time you want to reschedule.
The procedure is the same as explained in your first post and yes you can reschedule it one day before it is due ( but I would strongly advise against it if this is the second time you want to reschedule ).
But I guess since your wife is in India you have no choice. Consult your lawyer also in this case so as to keep him in the loop and get his advise also.
more...
house golden-retriever-puppy-6.jpg
b_boy
04-21 05:27 PM
I and my my spose applied for AP during April 1st week, both of our AP got rejected because of incorrect fee even though we paid correct fee (305$ each applicant), has any one been in this state, please share your experiences.
I have re-sent the application mentioning Advance parole does not require biometrics so additional 85$ fee is not required.
When I called USCIS they mentioned it might have been rejected in error, please share your experiences.
I have re-sent the application mentioning Advance parole does not require biometrics so additional 85$ fee is not required.
When I called USCIS they mentioned it might have been rejected in error, please share your experiences.
tattoo Golden Retriever Puppy in
FinalGC
01-14 05:22 PM
Remember in a marriage case....it is a 2 step process...Initially they get a temporary Gc and then after 2 years they get a permanent GC. So, she needs to see which GC is she getting before making any decisions.
Also ask them to go for counselling....if they can reconcile...
Also ask them to go for counselling....if they can reconcile...
more...
pictures golden retriever puppies
waitforgc1
06-05 04:40 PM
Thanks!!! For providing this information.
dresses Golden Retriever Puppies
Ind-Can
01-04 12:24 PM
Hello All,
I got my US green card in EB3-I category through consular processing after an interview in Montreal, Canada in 2004.
My PD is 29 March 2002. My family could not accompany me to the interview and hence they did not get their green cards at that time. I wanted to schedule an interview for them since 2008 and the Montreal Consulate informed me that my PD is not current. This is somewhat strange as I have already got my Green card in 2004. I have tried all options but everyone tells me that I have to wait till my PD becomes current. I am not a US citizen yet. The way EB3-I is going it will be easily another year till my PD becomes current. (The PD date has moved by 1 month in the last 6 months)
I will appreciate if anyone has any suggestions for me.
Thank You!
I got my US green card in EB3-I category through consular processing after an interview in Montreal, Canada in 2004.
My PD is 29 March 2002. My family could not accompany me to the interview and hence they did not get their green cards at that time. I wanted to schedule an interview for them since 2008 and the Montreal Consulate informed me that my PD is not current. This is somewhat strange as I have already got my Green card in 2004. I have tried all options but everyone tells me that I have to wait till my PD becomes current. I am not a US citizen yet. The way EB3-I is going it will be easily another year till my PD becomes current. (The PD date has moved by 1 month in the last 6 months)
I will appreciate if anyone has any suggestions for me.
Thank You!
more...
makeup Featured Golden Retriever
snathan
05-31 12:52 PM
Can I send my daughter to India for an year without having reentry permit?(she has greencard) (or) what is the maximum period children can stay out of US after getting greencard?
Max. 180 days...She needs to be in the US for min. of 180 days per year to maintain the LPR.
Max. 180 days...She needs to be in the US for min. of 180 days per year to maintain the LPR.
girlfriend Steiff Yellow Golden Retriever
[uber]
04-24 10:16 PM
Cute... 2 stamps///
hairstyles Golden Retriever Puppy
zilmax007
08-07 01:05 PM
You can use this US Consulate package service here, but it is expensive:
www.sandiegoleisure.com
www.sandiegoleisure.com
apt29
09-05 09:52 AM
I guess you can use your old I-94 to travel canada. Please see following link.
http://travel.state.gov/visa/temp/without/without_1260.html
When you travelled, they would pull the old I-94 and give new one.
http://travel.state.gov/visa/temp/without/without_1260.html
When you travelled, they would pull the old I-94 and give new one.
Blog Feeds
06-13 05:20 PM
Last week I attended the Annual Immigration Lawyers conference in Las Vegas. During the conference, government officials spent some time to update the attendees of the most recent information and upcoming changes.
It seems that the collection of the $500 fraud fee for new H1B or L-1 petitions is being used to invest in hiring more investigators. One recent trend is that business practices that were standard and went unchallenged previously, now are being viewed as �fraud.� Many companies must revise their practices to meet current standards. This does not mean that these practices of employers or businesses are necessarily fraudulent.
The biggest frustration for lawyers dealing with H1B's are the unreasonable RFE's being issued by the service since the April 1 filing. USCIS is making requests for photos of the premises, copies of contracts between all involved parties, and evidence of doing business including leases, licenses, and other proof. These requests are onerous for employers, as well as disruptive and harmful to both the employer and the employee when the H1B petition is often denied without valid justification.
USCIS presumes fraud if the employer meets two out of the following three criteria: has been doing business for fewer than ten years, has fewer than 25 employees, and/or has less than $10 million in revenue. Most well-established, bona fide companies started with these drawbacks. Even many large, well-known, highly-reputable companies are being issued intensive requests for evidence (RFEs) that seem to be without basis. This trend must stop, otherwise employers will be discouraged from filing for new H1B workers.
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2009/06/h1b_visa_lawyer_cap_not_met_an.html)
It seems that the collection of the $500 fraud fee for new H1B or L-1 petitions is being used to invest in hiring more investigators. One recent trend is that business practices that were standard and went unchallenged previously, now are being viewed as �fraud.� Many companies must revise their practices to meet current standards. This does not mean that these practices of employers or businesses are necessarily fraudulent.
The biggest frustration for lawyers dealing with H1B's are the unreasonable RFE's being issued by the service since the April 1 filing. USCIS is making requests for photos of the premises, copies of contracts between all involved parties, and evidence of doing business including leases, licenses, and other proof. These requests are onerous for employers, as well as disruptive and harmful to both the employer and the employee when the H1B petition is often denied without valid justification.
USCIS presumes fraud if the employer meets two out of the following three criteria: has been doing business for fewer than ten years, has fewer than 25 employees, and/or has less than $10 million in revenue. Most well-established, bona fide companies started with these drawbacks. Even many large, well-known, highly-reputable companies are being issued intensive requests for evidence (RFEs) that seem to be without basis. This trend must stop, otherwise employers will be discouraged from filing for new H1B workers.
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2009/06/h1b_visa_lawyer_cap_not_met_an.html)
No comments:
Post a Comment